Alex Tarnava Facebook and Instagram ad

Do you want to see more research in lifestyle interventions like molecular hydrogen therapy? Particularly, more research that isn’t tied to a funder able to control the release of data?

Got my copies of StressHacked—available free as a download at AlexTarnava.com as a PDF (audio download coming soon). All proceeds from online platforms such as Amazon will go to further market this, and all upcoming books. StressHacked isn’t short, and it’s not an easy read, it wasn’t meant to be.

“Now part of my daily routine.” Humbling words from @drdrewpinsky When I started developing the hydrogen tablet technology, I was doing it in my kitchen, with a mortar and pestle and hand press, and I was doing it to try to address my own issues. Now, my technology has global patents, regulatory approvals, 21 structure-function claims, a couple dozen clinical trials, and we’re making 40 million doses a month and counting. Sometimes I need to step back and ask myself if it’s real. I question how someone with no formal education, and no family money could possibly develop a health-related technology used by millions, including high-profile athletes, Doctors, and celebrities. How I could publish 20+ papers and counting through peer review in academic journals. Could be invited to speak at academic conferences-and collaborate with universities around the world. It sounds unbelievable-and I’m certain many in the comments will claim as much. If you’re a skeptic, great. Stick around. Listen to what I have to say. If I’m wrong on something, let me know-you may be surprised at how I’ll respond.

Compliance being taught as a virtue is a double edged sword. It can work for societal cohesion, which under certain conditions can be a noble aspiration, promoting compassion, ethical considerations for the group, and trained morality; yet, it can also be used to drive us towards immoral acts, bend our will towards nefarious masters, and drive us away from the very noble aspirations we are led to believe we are pursuing. The question between complying, abandoning our individuality to do so for the benefit of the group—and defying the group to stay true to ourselves, at the expense of the group—is an age old ethical dilemna. However, serving a master that harms the group, while also abandoning our own individualistic desires, and the pursuit of purpose, is inarguably destructive, and disastrous. For those compelled to a purpose, especially a noble one, you owe it to yourself—and humanity—to pursue it. Only when enough of us decide to forge our own way, break the script, is any true change possible. Change occurs from deliberate, intentional action, through constructing new frameworks. Not from tearing down.